Skip to content




Shock Doctrine

Stephen Roach, an economist from Morgan Stanley that I respect greatly, wrote a good opinion piece in the financial times yesterday questioning the reappointment of Ben Bernanke.  His main point is that, like Greenspan, Bernanke was partly to fault for the runup in housing prices and subsequent fall of all assets tied to it, so why is he being touted as a champion for “saving the world”?

I would like to broaden this approach a little bit further to my own opinion that somewhat falls in line with The Shock Doctrine written by Naomi Klein.   Her approach was more along the lines of using war to expand government.  I think the bigger demon in the system is the use of financial crisis to expand the government.  The government has allowed massive financial institutions to reign unchecked and able to borrow at extremely cheap rates (free money) for nearly two decades.  The banks got reckless and the government did not provide adequate oversight which subsequently caused a systemic crash in the financial markets.  The government responds by saying it is absolutely necessary to expand their monetary/financial institution control systems while funding bailouts and stimulus  in order to save the entire global financial system from utter collapse, thereby increasing the size of the government in general.   It is as if you get a promotion for doing a terrible job in the first place…

All a government needs to do is create mayhem in order to grab more control.  How would you like to run an organization that is capable of causing disasters, printing your own money or collecting more money via taxes (no budget), while controlling a military power that is the strongest in the world?  Where exactly are the checks and balances in this system?  How can I, as a citizen, demand that my currency not be destroyed and that my income not be cut in half or more via taxes and inflation?  I want to work for myself and for our country’s infrastructure, education and defense…not for the corrupt who are in control of the financial house of cards.

"Naturally the common people don’t want war. But after all, it is the
leaders of a country who determine the policy, and it’s always a
simple matter to drag people along whether it is a democracy or a
fascist dictatorship, or a parliament, or a communist dictatorship.
Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of
the leaders.  This is easy.  All you have to do is tell them they are
being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and
for exposing the country to danger.  It works the same in every
country.”
   --- Hermann Goering, Hitler’s Reich Marshall, at the Nuremberg
Trials
Be Sociable, Share!

Posted in Conspiracy, Markets, Media, Politics.

Tagged with , , , .


3 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

Continuing the Discussion

  1. Devaluation of the Dollar – SurlyTrader linked to this post on October 13, 2009

    […] The most amusing part of this speech is that he treats the international money speculators as terrorists waging a war on America and they must be defeated(Shock Doctrine?): […]

  2. Top Equity News » Blog Archive » History of the Dollar’s Devaluation linked to this post on October 15, 2009

    […] The most amusing part of this speech is that he treats the international money speculators as terrorists waging a war on America and they must be defeated (Shock Doctrine?): […]

  3. Climate Cooling? – SurlyTrader linked to this post on December 7, 2009

    […] Trade legislation sooner rather than later.  Unfortunately, this is just another example of “Shock Doctrine“.  If governments can convince their citizens that they are destroying the planet rapidly, […]



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.



Get Adobe Flash player
Copyright © 2009-2013 SurlyTrader DISCLAIMER The commentary on this blog is not meant to be taken as an investment advice. The author is not a registered investment adviser. There is no substitute for your own due diligence. Please be aware that investing is inherently a risky business and if you chose to follow any of the advice on this site, then you are accepting the risks associated with that investment. The Author may have also taken positions in the stocks or investments that are being discussed and the author may change his position at any time without warning.

Yellow Pages for USA and Canada SurlyTrader - Blogged

ypblogs.com