Skip to content




Waddell & Reed Culprit of Market Collapse

It turns out that the $70B asset manager Waddell & Reed may have caused much of the market commotion on May 6th.  Within a 20 minute span during the spike downward, Waddell & Reed sold 75,000 e-mini futures contracts.  That equates to a short position of 75,000*50*1100 = ~ $4B.

Waddell & Reed issued a statement saying that it was part of the “normal operation of our flexible portfolio funds”.  I do not buy it.  To adjust the position of the $70B of assets managed by nearly 6% in a 20 minute time-window makes absolutely no sense.  First, the futures market cannot handle that kind of volume in such a short window and they should understand that liquidity issue.  Second, why would they place all of these trades in e-mini contract and not trade fewer large contracts which have a multiplier 5 times greater which would lead to far fewer commissions?  Third, even if Waddell & Reed was hedging all of their fee income for the year that would only equate to a 1.25%*$70B = $875M or less short position which would never be put on in one day much less in 20 minutes.  Fourth, if they are dumb enough to move a large portion of their funds to market neutral or short positions during a one-day market decline then they deserve to lose money.

I am not buying the story so here are my theories:

1) This was a fat-fingered trade being covered up, a break down in operational processes, or an incredibly stupid strategy.

2) If this was merely a “hedging strategy” then they should have lost quite a bit of money, most likely an amount much greater than $20M

3) If they made money on these trades then either the fat-fingered mistake worked out to their benefit in which the sold a large amount on accident and started covering at much lower levels or this was more of a manipulation of the market in which they sold heavily knowing that the market couldn’t take it and bought back as it went into freefall.

It will be interesting to see what their next announcement states.

Be Sociable, Share!

Posted in Markets, Media.

Tagged with , , , , , .


2 Responses

Stay in touch with the conversation, subscribe to the RSS feed for comments on this post.

  1. scharfy says

    There’s no way on god’s green earth that selling that many mini’s was a ““normal operation of our flexible portfolio funds”

    Ha. 75,000 mini’s = 15,000 full contracts. Are they on crack putting that statement out?

    If thats a normal part of them hedging their ETF obligation’s or whatever they have on, I do not expect them to be in business very long. There was nothing to sell. They blasted the friggin market down an extra 60 handles hedging?

    Maybe they had their auto-hedge linked to NASDAQ faulty quotes and were not paying attention, or maybe some-one fat-fingered, but no sane human would ever hedge like that. And If they were selling mini’s on the lows like that, then they lost more than 20 mil. Way more.

    More to that story.

  2. duck you says

    Rumor is that barclays or JP Morgan mis-handled the order and pushed through all at once instead of breaking into blocks…



Some HTML is OK

or, reply to this post via trackback.



Get Adobe Flash player
Copyright © 2009-2013 SurlyTrader DISCLAIMER The commentary on this blog is not meant to be taken as an investment advice. The author is not a registered investment adviser. There is no substitute for your own due diligence. Please be aware that investing is inherently a risky business and if you chose to follow any of the advice on this site, then you are accepting the risks associated with that investment. The Author may have also taken positions in the stocks or investments that are being discussed and the author may change his position at any time without warning.

Yellow Pages for USA and Canada SurlyTrader - Blogged

ypblogs.com